Script Debugger gives you a full-featured trial for 20 days, and after that if you don’t want to buy it you lose some of the more advanced features but you can use the rest indefinitely anyway. There is no one program on your computer that can accomplish all that, but you can, with AppleScript. Your script could tell Word, or Pages, to print out a label, and tell Mail to now send an automated response back to the customer. You could then have the product details forwarded to another person (Packaging?) and the customer details forwarded to a third (Marketing?). With an AppleScript, you can have those emails automatically scanned, the customers’ order details extracted, and your Excel or Numbers spreadsheet updated accordingly. Imagine this scenario (scripts for this appear later in this series of posts): Suppose you run a small business and customer orders come in via email. To achieve things that none of those apps can do on their own. Why would you want to chain apps together like that? There’s no limit to the number of apps and functions you can chain together in this way (other than your computer’s resources). That means it can get one app to perform a function and pipe the result to another app to perform a different function that the first app didn’t have. And courageous stories of human vision - and confusion, hope and failure - can help illuminate the path toward a sustainable future.First of all, AppleScript can interact with other applications. Inspiring stories of innovative science and creative adaptation can demonstrate ways to successfully reduce emissions. Challenging, angry stories are needed to highlight the injustice experienced by the communities most affected. Stories about grief over environmental loss can help audiences process the complexity of coping with a radically changing climate. Done well, they remind people what’s at stake and, in some cases, depict what’s already reality for many people worldwide. This is not to say that climate disaster movies are entirely worthless. And two-thirds of Americans think large business and corporations aren’t doing enough to tackle the crisis, according to a recent Pew Research Center report. Of the 70 percent of Americans who are concerned about climate change, nearly half want to see more climate themes on screen, according to a survey done by University of Southern California Norman Lear Center’s Media Impact Project and Good Energy. Conversation is a necessary prelude to greater action, and compelling entertainment kick-starts this process by validating audience’s experiences and normalizing the discussion.Īs Joyner put it: “A really important part of the role that television and film play is making us realize that we’re not alone, which is a step towards action.”Īudiences are already hungry for the topic. More films that consider how humanity could limit global warming, adapt to a changing world or even cope with climate anxiety - could get people talking more about climate change. As the time available to bring global emissions under control shrinks, this is an all-hands-on-deck situation. Hollywood can, if it chooses, use its cultural power to influence the response to the climate crisis. Most climate films and TV series only nod to global warming - for example, the easy-to-miss overtones in “SpiderMan: Far From Home.” Only a handful tackle the topic head on, such as “Woman at War.” Together, Svoboda and I updated his research to include 100 climate change films and television series, spanning 1966 to present day, and found that 66 percent depict disaster or a grim future. But with global warming, he said, “we cannot let bedtime stories lull us into inactivity.” “It’s a psychological thrill, a fun bedtime story, and then we go back to what we were doing,” Svoboda told me. And despite being highly entertaining - I, myself, love them! - tales of doom, told over and over, don’t encourage action. The trouble is, audiences have become inured to end-of-the-world stories. The fossil-fuel industry is rarely even acknowledged. The genre includes all sorts of catastrophes, from floods and ice ages to hurricanes and sea-level rise. After watching 61 of them, Michael Svoboda, an assistant professor of writing at George Washington University, found that most featured disaster. So far, most climate-fiction movies have told bleak tales. Roosevelt called it a “necessary and beneficial part of the war effort.” During World War II, Hollywood churned out nearly 300 propaganda movies to maintain morale.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |